An AI automation agency that measures the hours it gives back
We find the process your team repeats by hand, automate it on infrastructure you own, and instrument it so you can see what ran, what failed, and what it saved. Starting at a price that does not need board approval.
- Self-hosted; your data never transits a third party
- You own the instance, the workflows, and the docs
- Retainer cancels any month, no notice period
Why this is worth building, and why us.
Every business has a handful of processes that quietly consume a person. Copying leads between systems. Re-keying invoices. Assembling the same report every Monday. Nobody owns the problem because each instance only costs twenty minutes, and twenty minutes never makes it onto a roadmap.
That is the work we automate. Not a digital transformation programme: a specific process, automated properly, with the failure handling that makes it something you can forget about. We are an AI automation agency in the literal sense: we use AI where the step genuinely needs judgement, and plain deterministic automation everywhere else, because it is cheaper and it does not make things up.
What we automate
- 01Lead capture and routing: enrich, score, assign, and follow up without a human copy-pasting
- 02Document workflows: intake, extraction, filing, and the approval chain around them
- 03Reporting: the Monday morning spreadsheet that three people assemble by hand
- 04Onboarding: the checklist of account creations and emails that fires on every new customer
- 05System glue: the integrations your SaaS vendors promised and did not deliver
- 06AI-in-the-loop steps: classification, summarising, and drafting, wrapped in review where it matters
Priced per workflow, so you can start small
Automation is the rare engagement where starting with one thing is genuinely smart. Fix the worst process, measure what it gave back, then decide whether to do more.
Know something is wasteful but have not put a number on it? One day, and you get every repeated process mapped, an hours-per-month cost against each, a ranked shortlist of what to automate now, later, and never, and fixed quotes for the top candidates. Credited back in full against any build you start within 30 days.
- Most chosenWorkflow Build$1,9971–2 weeks
One painful process, automated properly and handed over.
- One end-to-end workflow, deployed on infrastructure you own
- Error handling: retries with backoff, dead-letter path, alerts to a human
- Structured logging, so you can answer "did it run?" without guessing
- AI steps where the work needs judgement, deterministic logic everywhere else
- Documentation and a walkthrough with whoever will own it
- Two weeks of adjustments after go-live
- Automation Stack$5,9973–4 weeks
Several connected processes, plus the self-hosted setup to run them on.
- Up to five workflows, built as a connected system rather than one-offs
- Self-hosted n8n provisioned on your infrastructure, tuned and secured
- Shared error handling and a single alerting path across all of them
- A dashboard showing what ran, what failed, and what it saved
- Credentials and secrets handled properly, not pasted into nodes
- Documentation and training for the person who inherits it
- Automation Ops$997/moMonthly
Teams running enough automation that somebody needs to be responsible for it.
- Monitoring and alerting across your whole workflow estate
- We fix breakages caused by API changes, not you
- A new or reworked workflow each month, within a scoped envelope
- Monthly report: what ran, what failed, hours saved
- A named engineer who knows your setup
- Cancel any month, no notice period
- Self-hosted; your data never transits a third party
- You own the instance, the workflows, and the docs
- Retainer cancels any month, no notice period
- Fixed price per workflow, not per hour
Build prices assume the systems involved have usable APIs. Anything needing scraping, a legacy integration, or a vendor who charges for API access will move the number, and we will flag it during the audit rather than after. Hosting is typically a few dollars a month on your own infrastructure.
Automation you can depend on, or it is not worth having
The failure mode of cheap automation is not that it breaks loudly. It is that it breaks quietly: an API changes shape, the workflow keeps reporting success, and a fortnight of leads goes nowhere. You find out from a customer. That outcome is worse than never automating, because you stopped watching.
So every workflow we build ships with the boring parts first: retries with backoff, a dedicated error path, structured logs, and an alert that reaches a person with enough context to fix it. That engineering is most of what separates a build you can forget about from a cheap one you have to babysit.
AI where it helps, and nowhere else
Putting a language model in a workflow that does not need one adds cost, latency, and a new way to be wrong. If a step is "route to the right team based on which product they mentioned", that is a lookup, not a reasoning task. We use deterministic logic for anything deterministic, on principle.
Where AI genuinely earns its keep is the messy edges: classifying a free-text enquiry, pulling fields out of an invoice that arrives in six different layouts, drafting a first-pass reply for a human to approve. Those steps get a model, an eval, and a fallback for when it is unsure, because an automation that escalates when it is uncertain is worth far more than one that guesses confidently.
On your infrastructure, so it stays yours
We default to self-hosted automation, usually on n8n, running on your own server. Your credentials, customer data, and execution logs never transit a third party, which for regulated work is a requirement rather than a preference. It also means flat cost: a busy workflow costs the same whether it runs ten times or ten thousand.
You own the instance, the workflows, and the documentation. If you want to bring it in-house next quarter, everything is already in your name and there is nothing to migrate. We wrote up the platform reasoning in more depth on our n8n page.
What this is not
This is not a transformation consultancy engagement with a discovery phase measured in months. It is also not a marketplace gig where someone drags nodes onto a canvas until a demo works and disappears. Both of those exist, and both fail the same test: nobody is accountable when the thing breaks in week five.
If your processes are already well automated and the real problem is that nobody monitors them, say so. The Automation Ops retainer exists for exactly that, and it is a smaller, cheaper answer than rebuilding what already works.
Not claims. Shipped work.
- 01n8n automation agencyThe platform detail: why we self-host n8n, and when we will tell you to use Zapier instead.See the work
- 02AI Calling AgentProduction AI voice operations: proof we ship instrumented systems rather than demos.See the work
- 03n8n vs ZapierThe honest platform comparison, written by the team that runs both.See the work
Common questions.
01How much does an AI automation agency cost?
Ours are published: $1,997 for a single workflow, $5,997 for a connected stack of up to five plus the self-hosted setup, $997 a month for ongoing ops. The wider market prices automation projects between $5,000 and $35,000 and retainers between $1,500 and $3,000 a month. We start lower because we price per workflow rather than per programme, so you can fix one process and judge the result before spending more.
02How do you decide what to automate first?
Hours multiplied by pain, divided by fragility. The $297 audit puts a number on each candidate process, and the winner is usually not the one people complain about loudest; it is the quiet one running twenty times a day. We rank the shortlist and tell you plainly which ones are not worth automating.
03Which platform do you build on?
Usually self-hosted n8n, because you own the data and the cost stays flat at volume. For a non-technical team gluing two mainstream SaaS apps together, we will happily tell you Zapier or Make is the cheaper answer and point you there. When a workflow becomes genuinely load-bearing, we rebuild that path as a proper service instead of leaving your business on a canvas.
04What happens when an automation breaks?
On a Workflow Build, you get retries, a dead-letter path, and an alert that reaches a human with the context to fix it, plus two weeks of adjustments after go-live. On the Automation Ops retainer, we are the ones who get the alert and we fix it. Without a retainer, breakages after that window are billed as small pieces of work.
05Do we own what you build?
Yes: the instance, the workflows, and the documentation, outright. There is no licence and no lock-in. We can hand over cleanly to your team whenever you want, and the retainer is cancellable monthly precisely so staying is a choice rather than a trap.
What is your team doing by hand right now?
Tell us the process you keep repeating. We will tell you whether it is worth automating and what it would cost, or run the $297 audit and put numbers on all of them in a day.
- A real person replies, usually same day
- No sales sequence, no automated nurture
- Automation Audit is credited back if you go ahead